Freedom versus Presence - Behind the intention to build a
temple lies the mixed motives of genuine piety and self-perpetuating interests. But as
Brueggemann points out, whatever the motive, the story poses "an honest dispute in
Israel concerning the tension between Gods freedom and Gods presence."
[1] On one hand, a permanent site for the Holy would guarantee continuing presence; on the
other hand, such an arrangement would limit God from "coming and going."
Quotable Quote - This combination of faith and interest always keeps
faith close to the realities of public life . . . this same combination keeps biblical
faith always open to ideological usurpation, so that this gospel of grace and of messiah
is readily available for and vulnerable to all sorts of subsequent ideological use . . .
that is the inescapable character of biblical faith. We are not permitted to escape into
pure religion that has no risk of contamination. [2]
When If Becomes Nevertheless - One commentator has pointed to this
passage as making "the most crucial theological statement" in the Hebrew
Scriptures. Up to this point, God has related to people from an "If" /
"Then" covenantal contract. If certain predetermined requirements are met, then
God will bless. The corollary is equally binding-to mess up is to incur Gods wrath
and judgement. But here, such language is conspicuously missing. The Mosaic "if"
has been replaced by Gods bold "nevertheless" (verse 15).
Ever sleep in a tent on an
overnight camping trip growing up? What was your experience? Describe the house that you
lived in when you were a child.
What opportunity have you had that your parents never did? What do you want your kids
to have that you never did?
What is most surprising to you in/about this story? The prophets change of mind?
Davids possible motive? The presence vis-à-vis freedom issue? What?
Please see the sermon for this week on
DPS based on this text.
___________________________________________________
[1] Walter Brueggemann, Interpretation 1 & 2 Samuel (Louisville: John Knox
Press, 1990), p. 254.
[2] Ibid, page 258.
|