Sermons:
-
Not a Zero-Sum Reality, Mark 5:21-43
(see below)
Rev. Karen A. Goltz
-
Touching Lives with Love
Mark 5:21-43,
by Rev. Randy Quinn
-
Faith and Perseverance—the Two Sides of Effective Prayer,
Mark 5:21-43, by Rev. Frank Schaefer
-
The Healing
Power of God's Love,
Mark 5:21-43,
by SueCan
-
Death Where is Thy Sting? Mark 5: 21-43,
JP in NJ
-
Remember
And Join in Healing The World,
2 Samuel 1:1-4, 11-12, 17-27,
by Kay Vorhees
_________________________________________
Not a Zero-Sum Reality
based on Mark 5:21-43
Rev. Karen A. Goltz
By and
large, Mark’s gospel is pretty linear in its structure. It’s fast-paced, but
it’s linear. Things happen very quickly in Mark; everything takes place
immediately, as soon as, or at once, but it all takes place one thing
at a time. Until today.
Today’s reading lumps two stories together,
intertwining them, events of one impacting the events of the other. Why?
What’s so special about these two stories?
They’re both healing stories. No surprise
there: Mark’s gospel is full of healing stories. They’re both about women
being healed—again, nothing remarkable about that. The very first healing
narrative Mark provides is Jesus curing Peter’s mother-in-law of a fever. But
there are differences between the pair, as well.
The first striking difference is the manner in
which the healing takes place. Jairus begs Jesus to heal his daughter, and
Jesus consents. We can only assume that had Jesus said no, Jairus would have
accepted that answer and gone home alone. The woman, on the other hand,
essentially sneaks up behind Jesus and takes her healing like a pickpocket
taking a wallet. Her hope is to remain hidden and anonymous in the crowd, and
only comes forward when it becomes clear that Jesus isn’t going anywhere until
he gets some answers.
Another difference is in the social status of
the people involved. Jairus’ daughter herself is virtually a non-entity. She
is a girl and a child: double property. But she is represented by a powerful
and influential man, who lowers himself to beg Jesus on her behalf for healing.
The woman was likely a woman of means at one time. We’re told that she’d
endured much under many physicians and had spent all that she had. Only people
with money could spend money on physicians. But she was well-moneyed no more,
and the nature of her illness had made her a social outcast for twelve years.
So we have a once-wealthy long-time social outcast compared to a girl-child with
no rights or influence who is represented by a well-respected and influential
leader of the synagogue.
The severity of their illnesses is different,
as well. The girl is on the brink of death and time is of the essence; the
woman has been living with her disease for twelve years, and a few more minutes,
hours, days, or even years before Jesus could heal her probably wouldn’t change
her prognosis very much. And finally we have the difference in their ages. The
woman is an adult. Assuming her affliction came upon her in early adulthood,
she’s probably somewhere in her thirties, or maybe forties. The girl is twelve
years old.
And that number – twelve – seems to link these
two stories together in a strange way. The girl is twelve years old; the woman
has been hemorrhaging for twelve years. It’s tempting to make the connection
that from the time this girl entered the world, this woman began to suffer. And
once the woman’s suffering ended, so did the girl’s life. Are the two related?
Can it be that the woman could not be healthy as long as the child was alive? [continue]
|